 |
|
Table 6. Effect of acetamiprid (with or without oil) on phytophagous and predatory mite densities, commercial orchard, September 2002.
|
Treatment |
g AI/ha |
CM cover spraysy |
Cumulative mite days |
Twospotted spider mite |
European red mite |
Total tetranychid mites |
G. occidentalis |
Z. mali |
Total predatory mites |
Apple rust mite |
| Acetamiprid 70WP |
167 g |
C1,C2 |
7 a |
1 a |
8 a |
35 a |
49 a |
84 a |
5 a |
| Acetamiprid 70WPx |
167 g |
C1,C2 |
3 a |
1 a |
4 a |
71 a |
34 a |
106 a |
5 a |
| Check (MD only)y |
----- |
----- |
0 a |
1 a |
1 a |
52 a |
43 a |
95 a |
2 a |
|
Means within columns not followed by the same letter are significantly different (Waller-Duncan k-ratio t-test).
Experimental design: RCB, 3 replicates (2 ha each); sampled 100-200 leaves/plot; airblast 1,871 liters/ha.
Tetranychid mite species composition (seasonal average): 36% ERM, 64% TSM, 0% MCD.
x Tank mixed with Orchex 796 Horticultural Spray Oil at 1% vol:vol.
y Low codling pressure in this block necessitated only spot treatment with azinphosmethyl during the second generation. CM cover spray dates were: 1st cover (1C) 31 May; 2nd cover (2C) 21 June; 3rd cover 26 July; 4th cover 12-19 August, 2002.
|
 |